Score: 34.7 | Matched keywords: agent, ai, benchmark, code agent, llm, prompt, token
Categories: cs.AI
AI-assisted coding agents are bottlenecked by input-token cost. Two pathologies of raw human input drive much of this overhead: tokenization inefficiency for non-English text and structural entropy in conversational prompts.
AI-assisted coding agents are bottlenecked by input-token cost.
Two pathologies of raw human input drive much of this overhead: tokenization inefficiency for non-English text and structural entropy in conversational prompts. Existing approaches act reactively by compressing already-bloated contexts or intervening after failures occur.
We introduce a pre-flight, edge-side prompt-rewriting middleware that operates between the developer and the cloud agent. A local Llama 3.2 (3 B) model performs cross-lingual translation into English, structural rewriting into a compact task-oriented format, and regex-validated rewrite-with-fallback safeguards to ensure the optimized prompt is never larger than the original.
AI-assisted coding agents are bottlenecked by input-token cost. Two pathologies of raw human input drive much of this overhead: tokenization inefficiency for non-English text and structural entropy in conversational prompts. Existing approaches act reactively by compressing already-bloated contexts or intervening after failures occur. We introduce a pre-flight, edge-side prompt-rewriting middleware that operates between the developer and the cloud agent. A local Llama 3.2 (3 B) model performs cross-lingual translation into English, structural rewriting into a compact task-oriented format, and regex-validated rewrite-with-fallback safeguards to ensure the optimized prompt is never larger than the original. We evaluate on OMH-Polyglot, a multilingual coding benchmark spanning Turkish, Arabic, Chinese, and code-switched specifications. Across three commercial LLM backends, the middleware reduces prompt tokens by 34-47 percent and total tokens by up to 18.8 percent while preserving or improving task accuracy. Ablation studies show that gains arise primarily from the rewriting stage rather than simple function-name extraction. Compared with LLMLingua-2 at matched compression rates, our method consistently achieves superior OckScore performance across all evaluated backends. These results demonstrate that proactive prompt optimization can substantially reduce inference costs without sacrificing coding quality.