← ListarXivPDF

#10 Can Virtual Agents Care? Designing an Empathetic and Personalized LLM-Driven Conversational Agent

Score: 32.5 | Matched keywords: agent, agent framework, large language models, llm, multimodal, retrieval-augmented

Categories: cs.HC

Abstract Snapshot

Compressed abstract

Mental health challenges are rising globally, while traditional support services face limited availability and high costs. Large language models offer potential for conversational support, but often lack personalization, empathy, and factual grounding.

Main idea

Mental health challenges are rising globally, while traditional support services face limited availability and high costs.

Method signal

Large language models offer potential for conversational support, but often lack personalization, empathy, and factual grounding. A virtual agent framework is introduced to provide empathetic, personalized, and reliable wellbeing support through retrieval-augmented architecture, structured memory, and multimodal interaction.

Contribution signal

Objective benchmarks demonstrate improved retrieval and response quality, particularly for smaller models. A cross-cultural study with university students from Vietnam and Australia shows the system outperforms LLM-only baselines in coherence, perceived accuracy, and empathy, with most participants clearly preferring the proposed approach.

Original Abstract

Mental health challenges are rising globally, while traditional support services face limited availability and high costs. Large language models offer potential for conversational support, but often lack personalization, empathy, and factual grounding. A virtual agent framework is introduced to provide empathetic, personalized, and reliable wellbeing support through retrieval-augmented architecture, structured memory, and multimodal interaction. Objective benchmarks demonstrate improved retrieval and response quality, particularly for smaller models. A cross-cultural study with university students from Vietnam and Australia shows the system outperforms LLM-only baselines in coherence, perceived accuracy, and empathy, with most participants clearly preferring the proposed approach.