Score: 22.4 | Matched keywords: fine-tuning, large language models, reasoning
Categories: cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG
We study a pipeline that curates reasoning data from initial structured data for improving long-context reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Our approach, ^2, constructs high-quality reasoning data through rigorous QA curation: 1) extracting and expanding tables from Wikipedia, 2) from the collected tables and relevant context, generating realistic and multi-hop analytical reasoning questions whose answers are…
We study a pipeline that curates reasoning data from initial structured data for improving long-context reasoning in large language models (LLMs).
Our approach, ^2, constructs high-quality reasoning data through rigorous QA curation: 1) extracting and expanding tables from Wikipedia, 2) from the collected tables and relevant context, generating realistic and multi-hop analytical reasoning questions whose answers are automatically determined and verified through dual-path code execution, and 3) back-translating step-by-step structured reasoning traces as solutions of QA pairs given realistic web-search context. Supervised fine-tuning with {gpt-oss-20 b} and {Qwen3-4 B-Instruct-2507} on ^2 yields consistent improvements across four long-context reasoning benchmarks and our alike ^2-Bench, with average absolute accuracy gains of +4.3% and +2.7% respectively.
Notably, our dataset facilitates self-distillation, where {gpt-oss-20 b} even improves its average performance by +4.4% with its own reasoning traces, demonstrating ^2's usefulness. Our code, data, and models are open-source at https://github.com/vt-pi-squared/pi-squared.
We study a pipeline that curates reasoning data from initial structured data for improving long-context reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Our approach, ^2, constructs high-quality reasoning data through rigorous QA curation: 1) extracting and expanding tables from Wikipedia, 2) from the collected tables and relevant context, generating realistic and multi-hop analytical reasoning questions whose answers are automatically determined and verified through dual-path code execution, and 3) back-translating step-by-step structured reasoning traces as solutions of QA pairs given realistic web-search context. Supervised fine-tuning with {gpt-oss-20 b} and {Qwen3-4 B-Instruct-2507} on ^2 yields consistent improvements across four long-context reasoning benchmarks and our alike ^2-Bench, with average absolute accuracy gains of +4.3% and +2.7% respectively. Notably, our dataset facilitates self-distillation, where {gpt-oss-20 b} even improves its average performance by +4.4% with its own reasoning traces, demonstrating ^2's usefulness. Our code, data, and models are open-source at https://github.com/vt-pi-squared/pi-squared.